For freelancers and agencies
The accessibility report you hand to a client
The free checker tests one page and shows you a list. This audits a whole site and gives you a document: every accessibility failure we can detect, grouped by WCAG criterion, explained in language a client can read, with the fix next to it. Same engine, same rules, and the same refusal to pad the count.
We reply within one working day with a quote and a payment link. 149 EUR, paid once.
What you get
- Up to 25 pages, taken from your sitemap. No sitemap is fine, we crawl outward from the home page instead.
- Every finding grouped by WCAG success criterion, with the page, the line and the element it sits on.
- A plain-language explanation and a fix for each one, written to be forwarded rather than translated.
- A score per page and for the site, so remediation can be prioritised and progress shown later.
- An explicit list of what the automated pass could not test, so nobody mistakes the report for a full accessibility statement.
- Delivered as a PDF within 2 working days. Your company name on it, not ours, if you are reselling.
What it cannot tell you
Automated testing finds a genuine subset of accessibility failures and misses the rest. Anyone selling you certainty here is selling you something they do not have. Specifically, this audit does not judge:
- Whether alt text is useful. We can see that it exists, not that it describes anything.
- Keyboard traps, focus order, and whether a keyboard user can actually complete a task.
- Colour contrast, which needs the computed styles rather than the markup.
- Whether a label, heading or link text makes sense to someone hearing it out of context.
- Caption quality, reading order, and anything that needs a person with a screen reader.
This is an automated audit and a remediation list. It is not a certification, and on its own it does not establish conformance with the European Accessibility Act or with WCAG at any level. It is the part of the work that can be done by machine, done thoroughly and honestly, so that the human review that follows starts from a much shorter list.
Who should not buy this
If you want to check one page, use the free Accessibility Checker. It runs the same engine with the same rule set and it always will. If you are a developer auditing your own site and you are happy reading a list of findings, the free tool is the whole product and you should not pay us anything. This exists for the case where the output has to be a document with someone else’s name on it and a deadline attached.
Why we can say what is worth fixing first
We ran this engine over 2,656 of the Tranco top 5,000 sites and published the whole ranking. 87.2% of them break the HTML specification on their home page. 27.2% ship an iframe with no accessible name. 42.7% have a form control with no label. Your report is ranked against that measurement, so it tells you where your site sits rather than only what it contains.
The same study lists the corrections we have made to our own engine, with dates and before-and-after numbers. That is the standard the report is written to.
Questions
What do you need from me?
The URL, and the company name that should appear on the report. Nothing else, no access, no code, no account.
What if the site is bigger than 25 pages?
We take the 25 that matter most: templates before instances, since one broken template is one fix that clears a hundred pages. Tell us if you need the whole thing and we will quote it.
Is it a subscription?
No. Paid once, no account to create, no card kept on file. Re-audits after a remediation round are something we are happy to do and will price separately.
What if you cannot reach the site?
Full refund, no argument. Some sites block automated requests entirely, and we would rather return the money than send a report built on what little got through.
149 EUR, once
Up to 25 pages, delivered in 2 working days, refunded if we cannot read the site.
We reply within one working day with a quote and a payment link. 149 EUR, paid once.